Telescope Comparison
Celestron CPC 800 vs Meade LX200 8"
The price gap is real. The question is whether the extra capability is worth it at your stage.
First light
Celestron · 203mm · £1,499
The automated deep-sky platform
- 203mm schmidt-cassegrain on a computerised mount with motorised tracking
- Good for: Moon, planets, bright nebulae, star clusters, and deep-sky objects
- GoTo system finds any object in its database after initial star alignment — no star atlas needed
- Tracking motors keep objects centred as Earth rotates — useful above 100×, essential for photography
- 18kg total — requires a fixed garden spot or car transport
Meade Instruments · 203mm · £2,299
The automated deep-sky platform
- 203mm schmidt-cassegrain on a computerised mount with motorised tracking
- Good for: Moon, planets, bright nebulae, star clusters, and deep-sky objects
- GoTo system finds any object in its database after initial star alignment — no star atlas needed
- Tracking motors keep objects centred as Earth rotates — useful above 100×, essential for photography
- 27kg total — requires a fixed garden spot or car transport
The full picture
The numbers that separate these two scopes — and what they mean at the eyepiece.
Aperture
Equal light-gathering. Aperture won't settle this comparison — the mount, focal ratio, and observing experience are what differ.
Focal length
Same focal length — identical magnification with any given eyepiece. Differences come from optical design and coatings.
Focal ratio
Same focal ratio — the same eyepiece gives equivalent magnification and true field in both scopes.
Mount type
Same mount type — setup experience and ergonomics will be similar. Differences lie in build quality and included accessories.
Weight (OTA)
Similar optical tube weight. Any portability difference between these setups comes from the mount, not the tube itself.
Optical design
Both Schmidt-Cassegrain designs — versatile, compact, good for planets and deep-sky. Differences come from aperture and mount.
At the eyepiece
Both scopes · same aperture
Both scopes share essentially the same aperture — views through each will be very similar on all standard targets. The differences show up in setup, mount type, and focal ratio, not in fundamental light-gathering.
The real tradeoff
Both scopes are capable. The question is which one fits the way you actually observe.
The Meade LX200 8" costs 53% more. The premium buys a more capable mount and better build quality, not larger optics. For a first telescope, the Celestron CPC 800 is the smarter entry point. Return to the Meade LX200 8" when you know from experience what you actually need.
The dark side
Every scope has a personality. Here’s where each one gets difficult.
Celestron
Celestron CPC 800
Alignment required every session
GoTo star alignment cannot be skipped — the mount needs to know where it is pointing before it can find objects. This adds several minutes to the start of every session, every time.
Not a spontaneous telescope
At 18kg total, this goes out when you plan to go out — not for a quick look on a clear evening.
Meade Instruments
Meade LX200 8"
Alignment required every session
GoTo star alignment cannot be skipped — the mount needs to know where it is pointing before it can find objects. This adds several minutes to the start of every session, every time.
Not a spontaneous telescope
At 27kg total, this goes out when you plan to go out — not for a quick look on a clear evening.
Which is right for you?
Two different buyers. Two different right answers.
The automated deep-sky platform
Celestron · Celestron CPC 800
You’ll love this if…
- You want to navigate straight to targets without a star atlas — align once and the scope slews to any object in its database on demand
- You observe from a light-polluted garden where star-hopping to faint deep-sky objects would take most of a clear night
- Astrophotography is where you're headed — the tracking equatorial mount is the essential first component of any imaging setup
This will frustrate you if…
- You find the star alignment required at the start of every session frustrating — GoTo alignment cannot be skipped, and several minutes on a cold night before you can observe is the reality
- You want to take it out for spontaneous sessions — at this weight, getting it in and out of a car on your own requires planning and ideally a second pair of hands
The automated deep-sky platform
Meade Instruments · Meade LX200 8"
You’ll love this if…
- You want to navigate straight to targets without a star atlas — align once and the scope slews to any object in its database on demand
- You observe from a light-polluted garden where star-hopping to faint deep-sky objects would take most of a clear night
- You want objects to stay centred at high magnification without having to manually nudge the scope every few minutes
This will frustrate you if…
- You find the star alignment required at the start of every session frustrating — GoTo alignment cannot be skipped, and several minutes on a cold night before you can observe is the reality
- You want to take it out for spontaneous sessions — at this weight, getting it in and out of a car on your own requires planning and ideally a second pair of hands
Our verdict
At £1,499 versus £2,299, the Meade LX200 8" costs 53% more. The extra money buys a more capable mount and better build quality, not larger optics.
For most buyers starting out, the Celestron CPC 800 is the sensible choice — put the savings into a better eyepiece. The Meade LX200 8" makes sense once you know exactly why you need what it offers. If I had to choose: the Celestron CPC 800, and spend the difference on a quality eyepiece.
Celestron CPC 800
View Celestron CPC 800 →Meade LX200 8"
View Meade LX200 8" →Deep field: Full specifications
Every data point, for those who want to go further.
Full specifications
Fields highlighted in blue or amber indicate the better value for that spec. Data is manufacturer-stated and may vary.
How much can it see?
| Spec | Celestron CPC 800 | Meade LX200 8" |
|---|---|---|
Aperture The most important spec — bigger = more light = better views | 203mm | 203mm |
Focal Length Longer = more magnification potential | 2032mm | 2032mm |
Focal Ratio Lower f-number = wider field of view; higher = more magnification per eyepiece | f/10 | f/10 |
Optical Design The type of optics — each design has different strengths | Schmidt-Cassegrain | Schmidt-Cassegrain |
Coatings Better coatings = more light transmission through the optics | Starbright XLT coatings | Fully multi-coated Schmidt-Cassegrain optics |
How do you point it?
| Spec | Celestron CPC 800 | Meade LX200 8" |
|---|---|---|
Mount Type The mechanical system that holds and moves the telescope | GoTo (Computerised) | GoTo (Computerised) |
GoTo Computer-controlled pointing — finds any of thousands of objects automatically | ||
Tracking Motor keeps objects centred as the Earth rotates — essential for astrophotography |
The focuser
| Spec | Celestron CPC 800 | Meade LX200 8" |
|---|---|---|
Focuser Size 2" accepts wider eyepieces and gives better low-power views | 2" | 2" |
Focuser Type Rack-and-pinion is standard; Crayford and dual-speed are smoother | SCT rear-port with 2-inch adapter | SCT rear-cell focuser (2" visual back) |
Size & weight
| Spec | Celestron CPC 800 | Meade LX200 8" |
|---|---|---|
OTA Weight Optical tube only — useful for comparing mount load capacity | 11kg | 11kg |
Total Weightⓘ Full setup including mount — this is what you lug to the car | 18kg | 27kg |
Tube Length | 432mm | 432mm |
Tube Material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
What's in the box?
| Spec | Celestron CPC 800 | Meade LX200 8" |
|---|---|---|
Eyepieces Included eyepieces — more is better, but quality matters more than quantity | 40mm and 13mm eyepieces | 26mm eyepiece |
Finder Scope Helps you locate areas of the sky before switching to the main eyepiece | StarPointer Pro red dot | 8x50 optical finder |
Diagonalⓘ Tilts the eyepiece 90° for comfortable viewing — useful on refractors |
Smart features
| Spec | Celestron CPC 800 | Meade LX200 8" |
|---|---|---|
Built-in Camera Records and stacks images automatically — no separate camera needed | ||
App Controlled | ||
WiFi | ||
Battery Included |
Blue highlight: Celestron CPC 800 advantage · Amber highlight: Meade LX200 8" advantage · Greyed cells: equal or subjective.