From the community
What owners say
Based on 24 Cloudy Nights discussions
What they love
- ✓Sharp field across entire field of view when properly cooled and collimated
- ✓Superior off-axis star sharpness compared to standard SCTs
- ✓Excellent performance on planets, Moon, and double star splitting
- ✓When seeing conditions are good and scope is thermally equilibrated, produces textbook Airy patterns
- ✓Better planetary imaging results compared to standard SCTs
What caught them off guard
- !Fuzzy or mushy in-focus star images at medium to high magnification (150X-300X)
- !Takes extremely long time to cool down - up to 4 hours to reach thermal equilibrium
- !Interior thermal issues persist for hours due to sealed baffle tube with corrector lenses
- !Heat plumes visible in defocused star images
- !Stars never appear as sharp as refractor optics
Top targets reported by owners
What you'll see
Jupiter
described as 'very good' on warm nights with steady conditions; excellent for planetary detail when…
Mars
'unbelievably steady' views during daytime opposition observing with striking color contrast; holds…
The Moon
performs well for lunar crater observation; one owner found it better than previous non-Edge SCTs
Double stars
split cleanly and cleanly when seeing permits; good test of actual performance vs thermal artifacts
Worth knowing before you buy
Extended cooldown time due to sealed baffle tube with corrector lenses on both ends; takes 3-4 hours to reach thermal eq…
Thermal air currents trapped inside the sealed tube degrade star images even after extended cooldown, visible as heat pl…
Stars appear softer or mushier than expected at medium to high magnifications (150X-300X) compared to refractors, requir…
Head to head
How it compares

EdgeHD 11"
Celestron

EdgeHD 9.25"
Celestron
279mm · GoTo Schmidt-Cassegrain vs 235mm · GoTo Schmidt-Cassegrain
Full comparison →

EdgeHD 11"
Celestron

NexStar Evolution 9.25
Celestron
279mm · GoTo Schmidt-Cassegrain vs 235mm · GoTo Schmidt-Cassegrain
Full comparison →

EdgeHD 11"
Celestron

EdgeHD 8" + CGX
Celestron
279mm · GoTo Schmidt-Cassegrain vs 203mm · GoTo Schmidt-Cassegrain
Full comparison →
Frequently asked
Questions from owners
Sourced from Cloudy Nights discussions.
- How long does the EdgeHD 11 take to cool down and reach thermal equilibrium?
- The EdgeHD takes significantly longer to cool than standard SCTs due to its sealed baffle tube with optical elements at both ends. Multiple owners report 3-4 hours for full thermal equilibrium in winter conditions, compared to about 1-2 hours for non-Edge SCTs.
- Why do my star images look fuzzy or mushy even with good collimation?
- Thermal issues from the sealed tube design are the primary culprit—trapped heat inside the baffle creates distortion for hours even after cooling time. Atmospheric seeing conditions also mask optical quality; you may be seeing the atmosphere rather than diffraction limits.
- Is the EdgeHD really better than a standard C8 or C11 for visual observing?
- The EdgeHD delivers sharper stars across the entire field of view due to its coma-corrected design, particularly at the edge of the field where standard SCTs degrade significantly. However, this advantage only manifests under good seeing conditions and proper thermal equilibrium; on poor nights the difference disappears.
- Should I use the 1.25" or 2" visual back for visual observing?
- Back focus distance is less critical for visual than for imaging, so both work acceptably. However, using a 2" shorty diagonal with the 1.
- Can I fix thermal and cooling issues with active cooling fans?
- Aftermarket fans like the TEMPest system from Deep Space Products are available and help somewhat by moving trapped air in the rear cell, but they do not dramatically solve the fundamental thermal lag of the sealed baffle design. Wrapping with multiple layers of Reflectix bubble wrap and simply allowing longer cool-down time are more effective strategies than active cooling alone.
- Will the EdgeHD outperform my refractor on planets and the Moon?
- Yes—under good seeing and proper thermal equilibrium, the EdgeHD delivers superior planetary and lunar views compared to similarly sized apochromatic refractors due to higher contrast, better splitting of doubles, and more light-gathering. However, this requires patience for cooling and favorable atmospheric conditions; on typical nights the advantage may not be obvious.
Full Specifications
Optics
| Aperture | 279mm |
| Focal Length | 2800mm |
| Focal Ratio | f/10.04 |
| Optical Design | Schmidt-Cassegrain |
| Coatings | StarBright XLT fully multi-coated, EdgeHD flat-field corrector |
Mount & Tracking
| Mount Type | GoTo (Computerised) |
| GoTo (Computerised) | Yes |
| Tracking | Yes |
| Tracking Motor | Dual axis (CGX-L equatorial GoTo mount) |
Focuser
| Focuser Size | 2" |
| Focuser Type | SCT rear-cell focuser (2" visual back included) |
Physical
| OTA Weight | 11.8kg |
| Total Weight (with mount) | 48kg |
| Tube Length | 584mm |
| Tube Material | Aluminium |
Included Accessories
| Eyepieces | 25mm Plössl |
| Finder Scope | StarPointer red dot finder |
| Diagonal | No |